Research
|
|
My research interests span across visual cognition, eye movements, working memory, scene perception, reading, and navigation. My current work focuses on:
|
Publications
Peacock, C.E.^, Southwell, R.^, & D'Mello, S. (In Press). Getting the wiggles out: Movement between tasks predicts future mind wandering during learning activities. To appear in AIED 2023.
Peacock, C.E.^, Hall, E.H.^, & Henderson, J.M. (In Press). Objects are Selected for Attention Based Upon Meaning During Passive Scene Viewing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
Abitino, A., Pugh, S.L., Peacock, C.E., & D'Mello, S. (2022). Eye to Eye: Gaze patterns predict remote collaborative problem solving behaviors in triads. Artificial Intelligence in Education: 23rd International Conference, AIED 2022, Durham, UK, July 27–31, 2022, Proceedings, Part I.
Caruso, M., Peacock, C.E., Southwell, R., Zhou, G., D'Mello, S.K. (2022). Going deep and far: Gaze-based models predict multiple depths of comprehension during and one week following reading. International Educational Dating Mining Society.
Rehrig, G.L., Barker, M., Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., Henderson, J.M., Ferreira, F. (2022). Look what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Peacock, C.E., Singh, P., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2022). Searching for meaning: local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Peacock, C.E., Lafreniere, B., Zhang, T., Santosa, S., Benko, H., & Jonker, T.R. (2022). Gaze as an indicator of input recognition errors. To appear in ETRA.
Peacock, C.E., Zhang, T., David-John, B., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M., Benko, H., & Jonker, T.R. (2022). Gaze dynamics are sensitive to target orienting for working memory encoding in virtual reality. Journal of Vision. Link.
Peacock, C.E., Cronin, D.A., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2021). Surfaces and meaning combine to predict fixations during visual search. Journal of Vision. Link.
Henderson, J.M., Hayes, T.R., Peacock, C.E., & Rehrig, G. (2021). Meaning maps capture the semantic density of local scene features in scenes: A reply to Pedziwiatr, Kummerer, Wallis, Bethge, & Teufel (2021). Cognition.
David-John, B., Peacock, C.E., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., & Jonker, T.R. (2021). Towards gaze-based prediction of the intent to interact in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Association for Computing Machinery. Link.
Peacock, C.E., David-John, B., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M., & Jonker, T.R. (2021). Gaze signatures decode the onset of working memory encoding. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Workshop on Eye Movements in Cognitive State (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery.
Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2020). Center bias does not account for the advantage of meaning over image salience in attentional guidance during scene viewing. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognition. pdf
Cronin, D.A., Peacock, C.E., & Henderson, J.M. (2020). Verbal WM and visual WM affect scene viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. pdf
Rehrig, G.L. Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., Henderson, J.M., Ferreira, F. (2020). Where the action could be: Speakers look at meaningful scene regions more than graspable objects when describing possible actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. pdf
Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2019). The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes. Acta Psychologica. pdf
Henderson, J.M., Hayes, T.R., Peacock, C.E., & Rehrig, G.L. (2019). Meaning and attentional guidance in scenes: A review of the meaning map approach. Vision. pdf
Peacock, C.E, Hayes, T.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2019). Meaning guides attention during active scene viewing even when it is irrelevant. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1607-7. pdf
Peacock, C.E. & Ekstrom, A.D. (2019). Verbal cues flexibly transform spatial representations in human navigation. Memory. doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1520890. pdf
Killebrew, K., Gurariy, G., Peacock, C.E., Berryhill, M.E., & Caplovitz, G. (2018). Electrophysiological correlates of encoding processes in a full report visual working memory paradigm. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(2), 353-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0574-8. pdf
Peacock, C.E. & Gözenman, F. (2018). Encoding-stage adaptation effects: Long-term memory. Perception, 47(2), 216-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617739533. pdf
* PDFs are for personal use only.
^ denotes equal contribution.
Peacock, C.E.^, Hall, E.H.^, & Henderson, J.M. (In Press). Objects are Selected for Attention Based Upon Meaning During Passive Scene Viewing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
Abitino, A., Pugh, S.L., Peacock, C.E., & D'Mello, S. (2022). Eye to Eye: Gaze patterns predict remote collaborative problem solving behaviors in triads. Artificial Intelligence in Education: 23rd International Conference, AIED 2022, Durham, UK, July 27–31, 2022, Proceedings, Part I.
Caruso, M., Peacock, C.E., Southwell, R., Zhou, G., D'Mello, S.K. (2022). Going deep and far: Gaze-based models predict multiple depths of comprehension during and one week following reading. International Educational Dating Mining Society.
Rehrig, G.L., Barker, M., Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., Henderson, J.M., Ferreira, F. (2022). Look what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Peacock, C.E., Singh, P., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2022). Searching for meaning: local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Peacock, C.E., Lafreniere, B., Zhang, T., Santosa, S., Benko, H., & Jonker, T.R. (2022). Gaze as an indicator of input recognition errors. To appear in ETRA.
Peacock, C.E., Zhang, T., David-John, B., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M., Benko, H., & Jonker, T.R. (2022). Gaze dynamics are sensitive to target orienting for working memory encoding in virtual reality. Journal of Vision. Link.
Peacock, C.E., Cronin, D.A., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2021). Surfaces and meaning combine to predict fixations during visual search. Journal of Vision. Link.
Henderson, J.M., Hayes, T.R., Peacock, C.E., & Rehrig, G. (2021). Meaning maps capture the semantic density of local scene features in scenes: A reply to Pedziwiatr, Kummerer, Wallis, Bethge, & Teufel (2021). Cognition.
David-John, B., Peacock, C.E., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., & Jonker, T.R. (2021). Towards gaze-based prediction of the intent to interact in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Association for Computing Machinery. Link.
Peacock, C.E., David-John, B., Zhang, T., Murdison, T. S., Boring, M., & Jonker, T.R. (2021). Gaze signatures decode the onset of working memory encoding. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Workshop on Eye Movements in Cognitive State (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery.
Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R, & Henderson, J.M. (2020). Center bias does not account for the advantage of meaning over image salience in attentional guidance during scene viewing. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognition. pdf
Cronin, D.A., Peacock, C.E., & Henderson, J.M. (2020). Verbal WM and visual WM affect scene viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. pdf
Rehrig, G.L. Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., Henderson, J.M., Ferreira, F. (2020). Where the action could be: Speakers look at meaningful scene regions more than graspable objects when describing possible actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. pdf
Peacock, C.E., Hayes, T.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2019). The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes. Acta Psychologica. pdf
Henderson, J.M., Hayes, T.R., Peacock, C.E., & Rehrig, G.L. (2019). Meaning and attentional guidance in scenes: A review of the meaning map approach. Vision. pdf
Peacock, C.E, Hayes, T.R., & Henderson, J.M. (2019). Meaning guides attention during active scene viewing even when it is irrelevant. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1607-7. pdf
Peacock, C.E. & Ekstrom, A.D. (2019). Verbal cues flexibly transform spatial representations in human navigation. Memory. doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1520890. pdf
Killebrew, K., Gurariy, G., Peacock, C.E., Berryhill, M.E., & Caplovitz, G. (2018). Electrophysiological correlates of encoding processes in a full report visual working memory paradigm. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(2), 353-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0574-8. pdf
Peacock, C.E. & Gözenman, F. (2018). Encoding-stage adaptation effects: Long-term memory. Perception, 47(2), 216-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617739533. pdf
* PDFs are for personal use only.
^ denotes equal contribution.
